+91 9891914800
Mon - Sat 08:00-20:00
Get Consultation

Understanding the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act:

Understanding the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act: 

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, is a significant legal framework in India aimed at safeguarding children from various forms of sexual abuse and exploitation. Enacted in response to the alarming rates of child sexual abuse across the country, the POCSO Act provides a comprehensive legal mechanism to address and prevent such heinous crimes against children. This essay provides a detailed examination of the key provisions, objectives, implementation challenges, and societal impact of the POCSO Act.


Historical Context:

Before the enactment of the POCSO Act, cases of child sexual abuse were often inadequately addressed within existing legal frameworks, leading to impunity for perpetrators and continued vulnerability for victims. The need for a specialized legislation exclusively focused on protecting children from sexual offences became evident as reports of such crimes increased, highlighting the urgency for robust legal protections. The POCSO Act emerged as a response to this pressing need, reflecting a concerted effort by lawmakers and advocacy groups to prioritize the welfare of children and ensure justice for victims of sexual


Objectives of the POCSO Act:

The primary objective of the POCSO Act is to provide a child-friendly legal system that effectively addresses instances of sexual offences against children. It aims to safeguard the rights and dignity of children by ensuring prompt reporting, investigation, and prosecution of such crimes. Additionally, the Act seeks to create awareness among children, parents, and society at large about the importance of preventing and reporting sexual abuse. By establishing stringent penalties and punishment for offenders, the POCSO Act serves as a deterrent against
future instances of child sexual exploitation.


Key Provisions:

The POCSO Act encompasses a wide range of provisions designed to comprehensively address various aspects of child sexual abuse. Some of the key provisions include:

1. Definition of Sexual Offences: The Act defines different forms of sexual abuse, including but not limited to penetrative sexual assault, aggravated penetrative sexual assault, sexual harassment, and pornography involving children.

2. Special Courts: Special courts are established under the Act to exclusively handle cases related to child sexual offences. These courts are equipped with child-friendly facilities to ensure a supportive environment for victims during the legal proceedings.

3. Child-Friendly Procedures: The POCSO Act mandates the use of child-friendly procedures during the investigation, trial, and judicial process. This includes recording the statement of the child victim in a safe and non-threatening manner, ensuring privacy and confidentiality, and avoiding re-traumatization.

4. Mandatory Reporting: The Act imposes a legal obligation on certain professionals, such as doctors, teachers, and social workers, to report suspected cases of child sexual abuse to the authorities. Failure to report such cases can result in penalties under the law.

5. Protection of Child Victims: The POCSO Act prioritizes the protection of child victims by providing for measures such as anonymity, confidentiality, and witness protection. It also prohibits the disclosure of the identity of the child victim through media or any other means.

6. Rehabilitation and Support: The Act emphasizes the need for rehabilitation and support services for child victims of sexual abuse. It mandates the establishment of specialized agencies and programs to provide medical, psychological, and social support to such children and their families.

Challenges and Implementation Issues:


While the POCSO Act represents a significant step forward in addressing child sexual abuse, its effective implementation faces various challenges. These challenges include:

1. Underreporting: Despite legal provisions mandating the reporting of child sexual abuse, many cases still go unreported due to factors such as fear, stigma, and lack of awareness about legal rights and procedures.

2. Delayed Justice: The backlog of cases in the judicial system often results in delays in the trial and adjudication of cases under the POCSO Act, leading to prolonged trauma for victims and their families.

3. Inadequate Resources: The effective implementation of the POCSO Act requires adequate resources, including trained personnel, specialized infrastructure, and funding for support services. However, resource constraints pose a significant challenge in many regions, limiting the reach and impact of the Act.

4. Social Stigma: The societal stigma associated with child sexual abuse often deters victims and their families from seeking help or reporting the abuse. Addressing this stigma and promoting a culture of support and understanding is crucial for effective implementation of the Act.

5. Awareness and Education: Despite efforts to create awareness about the POCSO Act, there remains a need for continued education and sensitization among stakeholders, including children, parents, educators, law enforcement officials, and the judiciary.


Misuse of provisions of POCSO ACT and Judicial Precedents:

  1. The POCSO Act was primarily established for the purpose of protecting children from offenses like sexual assault, sexual harassment, pornography and so on which severely threaten and destroy the safety and wellbeing of the child. The Act recognizes these crimes as vile and heinous and aims to address them effectively using the law. Despite all of this, there are situations when the legislation is blatantly misused. Over the many cases that have traversed the Courts under the aegis of POCSO, it is noted that in many situations, the children are made to raise false allegations, leading to false complaints being filed against innocent people who are painted as heinous offenders and their names dragged through the mud. This is often done to exact revenge, to influence other cases like matrimonial disputes, property issues, and so on. There is no doubt that such allegations are an abuse of the very ideals of justice. However, there is no denial of the increasing cases where such happenings are noted. This is a crucial problem that threatens the sanctity of the Act itself.
  2. Section 22 makes scope for punishment where false complaints or false information is given. A child in this regard is exempted. But a false complaint by any other, solely with the intention to humiliate, extort or threaten or defame, shall be punished with imprisonment up to six months or with fine or both. False information provided against a child or a false complaint, where such allegation is known to him to be false, thereby victimizing the child can face up to one-year imprisonment, fine, or both.
  3. In Samsher Singh Verma v State of Haryana , Crl. App No. 1525 of 2015 SC, the Court considered the possibility that the allegation might be false and thus allowed for the accused to adduce evidence in the form of a recorded conversation which would possibly reveal that the complaint had been brought up just to subdue the accused in a property dispute.
  4. In Jaseer Aboobaker v State of Kerala, Bail Application No. 5068 of 2018 , High Court of Kerela, where it was argued that the false allegations were made to influence the granting of visitation rights to the father. The Court opines that ‘serious allegations have been leveled for securing a favourable order in the petition for custody pending before the Family Court cannot be nonchalantly brushed aside.’ In Anu P. Kumar v State of Kerala, MANU/KE/5705/2019, where it was alleged that the father had sexually assaulted his 15-year-old daughter, the allegation was countered by the accused as being false and fabricated in a plot to seek revenge by his wife with whom he was having a strained relationship owing to matrimonial disputes. That the Court takes into account the insubordinate delay in filing the case and several other facts and states that the delay of 19 months in registering the case is especially noted here and the Hon`ble, after a perusal of several SC judgements in this regard finds that ‘often than not, result in embellishments and exaggerations, which are the creations of afterthoughts. The delayed report, not only gets bereft of the advantages of spontaneity, but the danger of introduction of coloured versions exaggerated account of incidents or a concocted story as a result of deliberations and consultation also creeps in, which in turn would cast very serious doubts on the very veracity of the prosecution story.
  5. In Swarup Mohan v State of Kerala 2018 SCC OnLine Ker 21314, where the alleged victim was the 13-year-old son of the accused and where the relationship between his parents was strained, the facts and circumstances raised a high probability that this was a false allegation made by making the child a tool in the hands of his mother who had her own ends to achieve as she wanted to live with her current partner in peace after obtaining the divorce. The Court sums it up thus- ‘the complaint is full of incongruities and embellishments. The long delay in setting the law in motion and the events that transpired in between persuades me to conclude that it would not be advisable to place explicit reliance on the statement of the victim. A case of false implication of the applicant cannot be ruled out.
  6. In Children are taught by scheming adults to lie convincingly and to believe that they are indeed the victims of a heinous crime that never occurred. In Ramlal N.R. v State of Kerala and Ors (P Crl No. 468 of 2019, Kerela High Court) , a false complaint was registered against a school van driver where the facts itself combined with the statement of the eyewitnesses seemed to reveal the falsity of the allegation. When questioned by the Court as to the veracity of her complaint, the victim reveals that a police official had tutored her to alter her statement as her original statement (that the accused had hit her hand using his shoulder) would not have invited any punishment. The Court laments that the real victim in such cases where false allegations are raised are the alleged accused themselves. In Periyadinesh v State of Kerala and Ors (2019 SCC OnlLine ker 2761), the accused argues that that the allegations so made were false and baseless and had been ‘made out of misunderstandings in the mind of the young child and that the parents of the child have now sworn to affidavits stating that the allegations are made out of misunderstandings and that they have no objections in the grant of bail to the petitioner, etc.



Societal Impact:

Despite the challenges, the POCSO Act has had a significant impact on Indian society by raising awareness about child sexual abuse, empowering victims to seek justice, and holding perpetrators accountable for their crimes. The establishment of special courts and child- friendly procedures has improved access to justice for child victims, while the provision of support services has helped in their rehabilitation and recovery. Moreover, the Act has contributed to a broader societal discourse on child rights and protection, prompting initiatives to prevent and address various forms of child abuse and exploitation.



The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, represents a landmark legislation in India aimed at combating child sexual abuse and ensuring the welfare and protection of children. While challenges remain in its effective implementation, the Act has made significant strides in raising awareness, providing legal recourse, and fostering a supportive environment for child victims. Continued efforts to address implementation gaps, promote awareness, and strengthen support services are essential to realize the full potential of the POCSO Act in safeguarding the rights and dignity of children across the country.

Leave a Reply


This website has been designed only for the purposes of disseminating basic information about Dua's & Dua's, Advocates & Consultants, and the information that is otherwise available on the internet, various public platforms, and social media.We have ensured that the information provided herein is accurate and up-to-date. However, Dua's & Dua's, Advocates & Consultants shall not be responsible for any reliance that a reader places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information or its interpretation thereof. Visitors are advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.This website is in no way an attempt to advertise or solicit clients, and it does not seek to create or invite any lawyer-client relationship. The content herein or on such links should not be construed as a legal reference or legal advice. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’, the visitor acknowledges that the information provided on this website (a) does not amount to advertising or solicitation and (b) is meant only for his or her understanding of our activities and who we are.